The Backyard Philanthropist

September 8, 2009

Online ‘cast’ system or clout?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , — Beverley Claire Pomeroy @ 7:06 am

Seth Godin wrote an interesting blog on ‘clout’.

He suggests that there is this untapped measurement in those who are blogging, who have the most Twitter followers, how many friends you have on Facebook, and that measurement could amount to ‘clout’. “Which of your readers is the one capable of making an idea break through the noise and spread? Bloggers don’t have impact because they have a lot of readers, they have a lot of impact because of who their readers are…”

Knowing who has the most clout, you could focus your attention on those individuals versus the masses.  This sounds all too like a ‘cast’ system for the world wide web.  Where only the few attain elite status as a blogger, Twitter and the rest are deemed mere plebs; their musings merely creating noise throughout the bloggesphere.

However, I think it is already happening, even without the ‘Google-style’ data metrics.  We all know what blogs are pertinent, where we want our brand to appear, who to follow and try leverage their following.  Seth’s Blog being one of them, Beth Kanter…of course, Huffington Post, BlogHer.

I get people adding me on Twitter and sometimes I think, ‘Geez, what on earth do we have in common?’  Why would I follow that person?  I then immediately look at how many people are following them and I have to admit, I ‘judge’ that person based on their following, is it relevant to follow them back.

Seth brings up the question, quantity over quality?  And if you have quantity, how can you possible develop any relationships with those who are following you, or vice versa…how do you create a relationship with someone who has THAT many followers?

Online friend count, or followers…are just that ‘online’, and I still believe (despite the rumors I may be wrong), that in order to be successful; be it personally, professionally…as a nonprofit or as a corp, you need to expand those online relationships to offline.  That it isn’t enough to have 10,000 followers on Twitter…but it is enough to have 500 and develop those relationships offline into viable, quality relationships.

If we start using metrics as Seth suggests, this would allow us to vet the ‘important’ people…the people who have the most power online to spread the message, to promote your brand, to achieve the most donations.

It scares me because we are already doing this…and it really looks like an online cast system.  And to quote Marianne, from Marianne’s Motifs “some of the “cloutyest” people on the net are just polar bears pooing in the water.”

Don’t ask…she said it!

September 1, 2009

Social Media killed the Radio, or at least my Blog

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , — Beverley Claire Pomeroy @ 2:29 pm

Wow, so I have been incredibly remiss in writing a blog.  I was talking today to Diana, here at Pinc, and was asking when our next newsletter went out…thinking it was NEXT week, and I’d have time to put my ‘office’ work on hold and write a blog.  Yea, well, not so much.  Our newsletter goes out this week.  As a working mom of three, back to school shopping on the agenda…turfing out clothes tucked way in the back of drawers that no longer fit my always growing childen, and of course, living my life on purpose…how on earth am I to write a blog?

Ok, the above really isn’t my ONLY excuse for not having a topic…social media is.  Every day I receive dozens of newsletters in my inbox on philanthropy, change, giving, social enterprise.  My iphone buzzes with every breathe from direct mentions on Twitter .  I am receiving Facebook updates through my app and nosy me wants to go check out my best friend’s pictures of her camping trip! Toss in CNN, BBC, and CTV news feeds…and well, I am doomed.

Jake Hird from eConsultancy in the UK just sent out this blog with the most recent statistics on Social Media use.

In no particular order:

  • Social networks and blogs are the 4th most popular online activities online, including beating personal email. 67% of global users visit member communities and 10% of all time spent on the internet is on social media sites.
  • If Facebook were a country, it would be the fourth most populated place in the world. This means it easily beats the likes of Brazil, Russia and Japan in terms of size.*
  • 80% of companies use, (or are planning to use), LinkedIn as their primary tool to find employees during the course of this year. The site has just celebrated reaching its 45-millionth membership.
  • Around 64% of marketers are using social media for 5 hours or more each week during campaigns, with 39% using it for 10 or more hours per week.
  • It took radio 38 years to reach 50 million listeners. Terrestrial TV took 13 years to reach 50 million users. The internet took four years to reach 50 million people… In less than nine months, Facebook added 100 million users.
  • Wikipedia currently has more than 13 million articles in more than 260 different languages. The site attracts over 60 million unique users a month and it’s often hotly debated that the information it contains is more reliable than any printed Encyclopaedia.
  • The most recent figure of blogs being indexed by Technorati currently stands at 133 million. The same report into the Blogosphere also revealed that on average, 900,000 blog posts are created within a single 24-hour period.
  • It’s been suggested that YouTube is likely to serve over 75 billion video streams to around 375 million unique visitors during this year.
  • The top three people on Twitter (Ashton Kutcher, Ellen DeGeneres and Britney Spears) have more combined followers than the entire population of Austria.*
  • According to Socialnomics, if you were paid $1 for every time an article was posted on Wikipedia, you would earn $156.23 per hour.
  • The online bookmarking service, Delicious, has more than five million users and over 150 million unique bookmarked URLs.
  • Since April this year, Twitter has been receiving around 20 million unique visitors to the site each month, according to some analytical sources.
  • Formed in 2004, Flickr now hosts more than 3.6 billion user images.
  • Universal McCann reports that 77% of all active internet users regularly read blogs.

At the end of his blog, Jake says ‘…it needs to be remembered that no single piece of data can be used to base strategy or objectives upon, let alone be used as a forecast for future growth of a specific area of social media. To really drill down into a sector of interest, you need to fully aggregate and analyse all available data before making an informed decision or conclusion.’

Are you kidding me?  Now I have to aggregate and analyse ALL available data…before making an informed decision or conclusion?? …might get a proper blog out to you next week.

July 15, 2008

Facebook Fundraising

Filed under: Giving Sector, Tech Sector — Tags: , , — Beverley Claire Pomeroy @ 10:51 am

 P2P Vol 1 Issue 8 : Summer Camp in NYC (July 23)July 7, 2008 Facebook Fundraising http://www.fundraising-forum.de/facebookfundraisin… by Ted Hart 

You can’t seem to go anywhere these days without someone asking you whether you are on Facebook, MySpace or LinkedIn. If there is such a huge community interacting via these social networking sites, what opportunities does this create for fundraisers? Ted Hart takes a look

Those who will successfully raise money in the internet age are those who learn online fundraising is not merely an electronic version of direct mail. Successful charities will learn a whole new set of techniques and deploy a whole new generation of tools to inspire donors.

Whether it’s Myspace, Bebo Nation, Facebook or LinkedIn (or many scores of other social network sites), it is becoming more important to develop a strategy linking the digital life of donors and supporters to the charities they care about. The true powers of online-based methods lie in their ability to do more than simply function as a novel way to raise money. It lies in the areas of communication and the relationship building promise of Web 2.0. In fact, these are the real drivers of fundraising success both off and online. The internet is an ideal platform from which to inform and engage with potential donors, many of whom may be beyond the reach of normal fundraising channels. Communication and relationship building are key components to the successful use of these techniques.

Giving donors the chance to participate and to contribute beyond the gift is proving to be successful. While proving a serious area of growth, the use of these new techniques challenges the traditional top-down, ask-give relationship charities have traditionally had with their supporters.

Through the harnessing of advocates and donors, charities can develop communities of support far beyond their direct mail lists or even email lists. Online social networking has become one of the most important differences between what is traditionally practical offline and what is now possible to access online.

According to the Wall Street Journal, donors and volunteers are satisfying philanthropic urges on the internet, turning to blogs and social-networking sites to spread the word about their causes.

Members on several websites are beginning to tap into the power of the social networking model for charity/cause networking. Such sites may prove successful for connecting otherwise fragmented groups of interested and passionate users. Users benefit by interacting with a like-minded community and channeling their energy and giving.

For example, SixDegrees.org is a site launched by the actor Kevin Bacon, with the aim of bringing a conscience to social networking and for it to be a force for good, rather than just a game or a gimmick.

SixDegrees.org harnesses two important online trends: 1) the growth of social networking sites and 2) the increasing interest in using the web for inspiring people to raise money from others for causes they care about.

The online encyclopedia, developed and maintained using Web 2.0 tools, Wikipedia, has developed a list of social networking sites around the world, which can be found directly at:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites

Donors are spreading the word, even faster than charities are themselves. However, organisations from start-ups to long-established organisations are starting to catch up by launching profiles on sites such as MySpace and

Facebook that provide an opportunity for people to connect with a community of supporters. Facebook already had a popular “groups” application, and many social causes have posted content and started groups. Facebook Groups, developed by Project Agape, allows users to create causes, take donations, and recruit members. Whenever someone creates a cause or joins one, it shows up in their news feed for their friends to see. Information about the cause is also included in the profile itself, including total amount raised by that user and new users recruited. Facebook has a huge and active user base (20 million users, each viewing 50 pages daily), and they are a demographic that is highly likely to want to become involved actively in causes they believe in. Since launch the programme has attracted more than 2.5 million users and raised approximately US$300,000 for the organisations involved.

In late 2006, MySpace launched its Impact Awards in which users vote to recognise individuals and non-profits that have successfully used the site to make a difference. Change.org enables visitors to join ‘virtual foundations’ of peers committed to specific causes and to fundraise for them.

Charities should approach the Internet as a communication and stewardship tool first and a fundraising tool second. Any seasoned fundraiser will tell you that when you can build and enhance a relationship with a prospective donor, you have a much higher chance of successfully soliciting a gift.

We can now say, Web 2.0 and social networking techniques of online giving are no fad, but are tools and techniques that have already and will continue to change the way charities communicate with their supporters in the online world. However, as a charity is introducing these new social behaviors they should note it takes time to establish communication and fundraising norms.

Regardless of the cause, those who support nonprofits tend to be passionate about them and many can be called upon to become advocates, forwarding and recommending content to family, friends and colleagues. This important reality forms the basis of understanding the great opportunity that can be had by harnessing the passion of its supporters.

A website is the 24/7 advocacy and education hub for charities, but it is the legions of supporters, and the networks they represent that make the promise reality.

 

June 9, 2008

June 5, 2008

Is Facebook’s Fund Raising a Bust?

Filed under: Tech Sector — Tags: , , — Beverley Claire Pomeroy @ 10:19 am

June 02, 2008

Is Facebook’s Fund Raising a Bust?

The announcement by Facebook last week that its Causes application has raised $2.5-million in its first year drew disappointment in some quarters.

Writing on the blog TechCrunch, some posters say that figure is encouraging, particularly given that most Facebook users are young and don’t have much disposable income. But other comments suggest that $2.5-million is a tiny number for a site that has 12 million users.

Adam Hyman points out on TechCrunch that the $2.5-million total works out to being only $0.21 per user. “How can anyone call this a success?” he asks.

A blogger who identified himself simply as “FT” adds that Facebook receives a portion of the money raised by the application, so smart donors would be better off contributing to the charity directly.

Lael writes that Facebook’s causes doesn’t provide users with enough of an incentive to donate. “Most of the people I know who have the app installed haven’t ever donated. I think it’s just too easy to feel good by adding a cause and not donating,” she says.

But other writers on the TechCrunch blog point out that the Causes application is as much about raising awareness and support for charitable causes as it is a way to raise money.

Austin Hill writes: “More important then the actual number of dollars donated (although a good thing) is the social affect of users displaying the causes they want to associated themselves with.”

Other writers suggest that Facebook Causes is just getting started, and that, as its users age, they will be able to contribute larger sums.

(Read The Chronicle’s article about Facebook fund raising.)

What do you think?

— Caroline Preston

May 29, 2008

May 7, 2008

Microsoft eyeing Facebook: Globe and Mail report

Filed under: Tech Sector — Tags: , — Beverley Claire Pomeroy @ 10:55 am

Reuters

SEATTLE — Microsoft Corp. gauged Facebook’s interest in a possible acquisition after the software giant’s failed takeover attempt of Yahoo Inc., the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

The newspaper reported on its website that Microsoft’s bankers put out subtle signals to Facebook, the social networking website, to see if it would be open to a full acquisition.

The talks were first reported by website All Things Digital, owned by Wall Street Journal publisher Dow Jones.

Facebook spokeswoman Brandee Barker declined to comment on the report. Microsoft officials were not immediately available for comment.

In October, Microsoft took a $240-million (U.S.) stake in Facebook, which valued the start-up at $15-billion. Citing an unnamed source, the report said there are no active discussions between the two companies.

The news came a few days after Microsoft dropped its unsolicited offer to buy Yahoo for $47.5-billion. The aim of that proposal was to build an online advertising powerhouse to rival Google Inc. Facebook, founded in 2004 by Harvard student Mark Zuckerberg, has become one of the hottest properties on the Internet because of its rapid growth and the loyalty of its users. Facebook has more than 70 million active users.

In the past, Zuckerberg has resisted selling the entire company, opting to work toward an initial public offering.

Shares of Microsoft were up 5 cents at $29.75 in afternoon Nasdaq trade.

link: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080507.wgtmicroface0507/BNStory/Technology/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20080507.wgtmicroface0507

Powered by WordPress